Comparison

IMAGEPAC COMPARED TO THE CONVENTIONAL LIQUID PHOTOPOLYMER METHOD

Conventional method

a_Web_Site_Liquid_102

a_Web_Site_Liquid_202

a_Web_Site_Liquid_302

a_Web_Site_Liquid_402

FOUR STAGES CONVENTIONAL METHOD

Place coverlay
Remove entrapped air
Dam off required area
Slowly and carefully pour resin
Remove air bubbles
Cut backing sheet to size
Carefully lay backing sheet

imagepac

Web_Site_Lay_Clear_Sachet_Large02

 SINGLE STEP IMAGEPAC METHOD

Place sachet

imagepac compared to sheet photopolymer
imagepac is lower in cost
imagepac uses water wash instead of solvent wash
imagepac has better health and safety
imagepac is considerably quicker, taking a fraction of the time to expose, wash out and dry a sheet plate

imagepac compared to vulcanizing rubber
imagepac is much lower cost until you have made over three repetitions of the same plate
imagepac is much faster, taking 10 minutes to make a plate compared to 1 hour
imagepac does not have a strong odour or any risk of operator burning
imagepac uses very little electricity
imagepac will make a plate of higher quality

imagepac compared to laser engraving rubber
imagepac exposure units are a fraction of the cost of laser engravers
imagepac is much faster
imagepac has low odour
imagepac does not require expensive extraction equipment
return to top Comparison

© 2005 Polydiam Industries Ltd, 70-80 Markfield Road, London N15 4QF, England, UK
Tel: +44-(0)20-8493 1060 Fax: 020-8885 5711 Email: imagepac@polydiam.com   www.polydiam.com

[Home] [Imagepac] [Benefits] [Comparison] [Quality] [User Guide] [impagepac MSDS] [Imagepac Xtra] [imagepac 90] [imagepac daylight] [Art Stamps] [StampMaker] [Product Range] [Contact Us]